Whys Alives;94195 said:
How does all of the copepod's life stages being pelagic make it important and how does that affect prey size options for the fish? Also, pelagic is to the water column as benthic is to the sand bed?
Many many reasons, and yes pelagic is water column benthic means substrate (not necessarily sand bed, just surfaces).
Feeding in larval fish can be broken down to four basic characteristic needs:
1. Prey size - food must fit in mouth (various life stages of copepod nauplii mean various food sizes)
2. Encounter rate - how much food is available, will the larval fish encounter enough for substenance without over-exerting energy
3. Prey movement - Does the food source move in such a way as to stimulate feeding?
4. Nutritional content - The biggest downfal of traditional larval feeding methods as we currently use rotifers and baby brine shrimp both of which lack fundamental nutritional content. Thus we gut load and enrich the critters using them as more of a delivery mechanism rather than a food source persay
Having thrown all that out there many of the reasons pelagic copepods are being examined as a food source is that varying species posess all four of these qualities! It is important to think of copepoda as a large group containing several (several times several in fact) species with varying attributes. Hobbyists are familiar with the T. californicus species (Tigger pods) which is quite large and benthic but often fail to recognize that there are many other species out there with better attributes for larval fish. That is not to discount T. cali as a food source as it really is a very valuable species; it just does not posess the size and encounter specific needs of many larval fish. A larval fish swimming in the water column is not very likely to encounter a T. cali naup resting on the glass.